Optimising borehole planning: Saving costs through improved drill programme design
How many boreholes in your drill programme are actually creating value? In a simple exercise on a South African coal project, I compared two approaches to achieving Measured Resource classification across the same area. The traditional approach was: - Plan the Inferred grid - Drill the Inferred grid - Plan the Indicated grid - Drill the Indicated grid - Plan the Measured grid - Drill the Measured grid The result was 507 boreholes. The alternative approach was different. Instead of repeatedly redesigning the grid, the final Measured grid was planned from the start. During Inferred and Indicated drilling, boreholes were selected that already formed part of the final Measured pattern. The result? 397 boreholes. That is: - 110 fewer boreholes - 21% less drilling - The same Measured Resource classification outcome The lesson is larger than drill planning. Too often we optimise for geological certainty rather than economic value. Every additional hole has a cost: - Drilling - Logging - Sampling - Assaying - Data management - Time And every additional hole delivers less incremental value than the previous one. This is the law of diminishing returns applied to drilling. The objective is not to drill the maximum number of holes. The objective is to achieve the required decision confidence with the minimum number of holes. In other words: More holes does not equal more value. More value per hole = better decisions.
